I finally got around to seeing the movie Dreamgirls on DVD last night.
All I can say is: Fabulous. The songs, the singing, the costumes, the design, the delicious divaliciousness of the dueling divas: Fabulous.
But while I was enthralled for every one of the movie's 130 minutes, my partner sat next to me stone-faced, semi-miserable, and clearly thinking Please Lord, please don't let them start singing again. The boredom came off him in almost visible waves and at one point, midway through, when he got up to go the bathroom, I was surprised he even came back.
But my partner is a serious-minded kind of guy. He's not impressed by how amazing Beyonce looks in her shimmering, clinging gown in the movie's finale and he's not moved when she sings Listen with the fierceness of a woman on fire. He watches Jennifer Hudson's Oscar-winning performance and thinks "Eh, she's OK," and not "Oh my g-d, not since Barbra Streisand's seminal work in Funny Girl has there been a more auspicious musical debut." When the Dreamgirls perform the title song in front of a nightclub audience, and the camera swirls around them as the house lights dim and the flickering candles on the dining room tables make it look as if they're singing in a field of stars, he's thinking "is this song ever going to end" and not "this is magical."
So, if you're a theater queen like I am, and love a good musical, Dreamgirls is to die. If, on the other hand, you're looking for a compelling storyline and people who don't break into song when they're supposed to be speaking, feel free to give it a pass.

Took your suggestion and rented Dreamgirls. What a surprise! From your comments, I'd expected a stilted, song-intrusive film. But the movie was bright and propulsive; and the music, rather than interrupting the flow, expanded substantially on the story. It was revelatory, and, as you so aptly noted, extremely well done.
Couple of points. The praise for Jennifer Hudson, as well-deserved as it is, does not do justice to Beyonce's debut (at least in a featured role). She tended to be overlooked by most of the reviews I've seen, but she was fabulous. The other performers were also solid, especially an underrated star turn by Eddie Murphy. The only disappointment for me was Jamie Foxx, who felt too light for the role. He seemed to be "acting" his part, rather than inhabiting it as the other principals did. (Don Cheadle might have been a better "fit," though who knows if he can sing.)
Thanks for the heads-up on a movie I know I would have missed otherwise. It was "Dreamy"!
Posted by: Corey | July 25, 2007 at 10:51 AM
exactly where did you get this info can you please support this with some proof or you might say some very good reference as I and others will actually enjoy.
Posted by: true religion outlet | December 17, 2011 at 06:32 AM